SCROLL
Private AI

Private LLM: an assistant on your documents, with data on your servers or in the EU

A private LLM is a language model installed on your servers or a private cloud and connected to your company documents. It works like an internal ChatGPT, but data does not go to external services and each user sees only what they can already access. We know how because we run one: the assistant on our website uses Google’s open-weight Gemma model on one of our servers.

↓ Scroll

Why companies look for a private LLM

According to ISTAT (ICT in enterprises, 2025), among Italian companies that considered AI without adopting it, 43.2% cite privacy and data protection and 45.2% missing or poor-quality data.

Confidential documents

Contracts, projects, customer data: material you do not want to paste into a service whose location you do not control.

Ungoverned use

Colleagues already use AI tools with personal accounts. Without an internal alternative it is hard to stop.

Scattered knowledge

Procedures and manuals exist, but nobody finds them when needed.

Per-seat licences

With many users and heavy use, licence costs grow linearly.

ChatGPT, Copilot or a private LLM: an honest comparison

A private LLM is not always the right answer. Here is how we see it.

Business licences (ChatGPT, Copilot)

Ready immediately, with very capable models. Before choosing, check in the contract terms where data is processed and whether it is used for training.

Private model in an EU cloud

An open-weight model on a dedicated EU server that we manage. Control over data without hardware on site.

On-premises model

Everything on your servers: maximum control, but you need suitable hardware and maintenance.

How it works

1

Model

We choose an open-weight model suited to the task and the available hardware, or an API with EU processing when that is enough.

2

Documents (RAG)

We index folders, manuals and procedures. The model answers from them and cites the source document.

3

Per-user permissions

Everyone sees only what they can already access: original permissions still apply.

4

Logs and review

We log questions and answers in line with your internal policy, to improve content and check usage.

Hardware and costs: what they depend on

We quote after the free review. These are the factors that matter.

Model size

Larger models answer better but need GPUs with more memory. For many document assistants a mid-sized model is enough.

Concurrent users

What counts is how many people ask questions at the same time, not how many have access.

Volume of documents

Affects indexing and storage more than the model.

Management

Updates, backups, monitoring and content review are part of the running cost.

Security, the EU AI Act and GDPR

No training on your data

The model is not retrained on your documents: it reads them at question time.

Transparency (Article 50)

If the assistant also answers customers or suppliers, since 2 August 2026 it must disclose that it is AI.

AI literacy (Article 4)

Instructions for users: what to ask, how to check answers, what not to enter.

GDPR

Processing stays in systems you control. Records, privacy notice and log retention should be set with your DPO.

Private LLM: frequently asked questions

A language model installed on company servers, on site or in a data centre of your choice, instead of being used as an external service. Questions and documents stay within your systems.
On general tasks the largest commercial models are still ahead. For answering from company documents with RAG, a good open-weight model is often enough. We test it on a sample of your real questions before deciding.
It depends on model size and concurrent users. Many cases need a single GPU server; heavier use needs more. Alternatively we use a managed EU server, with no hardware on site.
No. The model reads documents at question time and is not retrained on your data.
Yes. The assistant on our website runs on Google’s open-weight Gemma model installed on one of our servers. It is the same kind of architecture we offer clients.
Yes, by indexing documents with their original permissions: each user only sees answers based on what they could already open.

Free review: what to automate with AI

Point us to a repetitive task: incoming email, documents, data entry. We check whether an AI agent can handle it, with which human checks and with data kept in the EU.

  1. Leave your emailEverything else is pre-filled: just tap the areas you care about.
  2. We call you back within one working dayWe book a 30-minute video call, no commitment.
  3. You get a written noteWhat to do, in which order and the likely cost range.

All we need is your email

We write the message from the areas you tap. A person on our team replies.

Check the address: the @ or the domain is missing.

What should we review? Tap one or more areas (optional).

Free and with no commitment. We use your data only to reply: privacy notice.

Thank you , we have received your request.

We will email you within one working day to book the 30 minutes. If it is urgent, message us on WhatsApp.

Prefer to talk right away?

Mon–Fri 9:00–12:30 and 14:00–20:00 (CET).

Hours lost on repetitive work? Free review with AI agents.

Request